Jeyapaul v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Fifth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.11231 of 2018 1 JEYAPAUL 2 RAMU 3 SILAMBARASI 4 SOLLAIAMMAL @ DHANALAKSHMI ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED Nos.1to4 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT IN CRIME NO.124/2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioners : Mr.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent Police for the offences under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506 (ii) of I.P.C. in Crime No.124 of 2018 on the file of the respondent Police.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent.

3.This Court went through the contents of the First Information Report. It is seen that the first petitioner Jeyapaul hit the de facto complainant on his head and caused injuries. 4.Taking note of the specific overt act attributed to the first petitioner, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him. The Criminal Original Petition is dismissed in sofar as the first petitioner is concerned.

5.Taking note of the other petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners 2, 3 and 4 with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners 2, 3 and 4 are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Ramanathapuram and on their executing a bond for a sum of https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners 2, 3 and 4 shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. 6.The petitioners 2, 3 and 4 shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed.

sd/- 05/07/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, RAMANATHAPURAM 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAMANATHAPURAM 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE RAMANATHAPURAM TOWN POLICE STATION, RAMANATHAPURAM DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.C.SUSI KUMAR Advocate SR.No.12399 TSG JAM/13/07/2018/ CSL-RR /VK/ 2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11231 of 2018 Date :05/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/