← Library
Madras High CourtHCP(MD)/885/2021dismissed

K.Rajeswari v. The Superintendent Of Police

2021-06-21Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram,Honourable Mr Justice B.Pugalendhi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :21.06.2021

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.PUGALENDHI K.Rajeswari ... Petitioner/Wife of the detenu -vs1.The Superintendent of Police, 2.The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of habeas corpus directing the respondents to produce the body or person of the Petitioner's husband/detenu namely, K.Kumaresan, son of Kathamuthu(aged 51 years) before this Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.Asaithambi For Respondents :

Mr.S.Ravi Standing Counsel for the Government

O R D E R

[Order of the Court was made by K.KALYANASUNDARAM, J.] The prayer in the Habeas Corpus Petition is to direct the respondents to Petitioner's husband/detenu namely, K.Kumaresan, son of Kathamuthu(aged 51 years) before this Court and set him at liberty.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court. 3.The Petitioner is the wife of the detenu. It is represented that on 12.06.2021, , he was taken by the respondents 1/3

Police for an enquiry in a criminal case, but till now, he is being illegally detained by the second respondent. 4.Mr.S.Ravi, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the State would submit that the detenu in this case is a suspected accused in dacoity and cheating cases. On 12.06.2021, he was taken for the purpose of enquiry and let free on the same day. He further added that the allegations that the detenu was harassed and is being illegally detained by the Second Respondent are false.

5.It is the submission of the learned counsel for the Petitioner that the detenu has now joined with the Petitioner. 6.In the light of the above statements made by the learned counsel appearing on either side, we find no merit in the Habeas Corpus Petition and accordingly, the same stands dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) // True Copy // / /2021 Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) vsn Note :

In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate / litigant concerned.

To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, 2/3

2.The Inspector of Police, Melur Police Station, 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

ORDER MADE IN 21.06.2021 KM(30.06.2021) 3P 4C 3/3