A. Muthupandi v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Tuesday, the Seventh day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.8713 of 2016 1 A.MUTHUPANDI 2 BOSAMMAL (*)3 PANDISELVI ... PETITIONER/ACCUSED 3,1,2 STATE REB.BY Vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT, CR NO. 28 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER: The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused No.3, 1 and 2, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 498(A) of IPC and Section 4 of DP Act in Crime No.28 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners have demanded additional dowry from the defacto complainant and also tortured her both mentally and cruelly.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent person and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the the investigation of the case is pending.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the first petitioner shall appear before the respondent Police daily at 10.00 am until further orders and the petitioners 2 and 3 are being ladies shall appear before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 07/06/2016 (*)Amended as per order of this Hon'ble HIGH Court made in in Crl.MP(MD)No.4658 of 2016 in Crl.O.P(MD)No.8713 of 2016 dated 16.6.2016 by VMVJ) (*)TIME FOR EXECUTING A SURETY IS EXTENDED FOR A PERIOD OF TWO WEEKS FROM TODAY.
/ TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THIRUMANGALAM, MADURAI DISTRICT, 2 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THIRUMANGALAM.
3 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S T.LENIN KUMAR Advocate SR.No.30935
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.8713 of 2016 Date:07/06/2016 SDR/GSV-PM/SAR I/08.06.2016/2P/6C GJM/GSV/PM/SAR-I-20.6.16-2P-6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/