Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8817/2016disposed of

S.Majid v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-14Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8817 of 2016 S.Majid .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Pudukkottai District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thirukkokarnum Police Station, Pudukkottai District.

.. Respondents (R3 suo motu impleaded as third respondent, as per the order of this Court in this petition) PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register the FIR on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 27.05.2016. For Petitioner : Ms.A.Banumathy For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondents to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 27.05.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that the proposed accused is trying to illegally sell the property belonging to the petitioner. As there was no case registered on https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

the said complaint, the petitioner has come up with this petition. 4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), the complaint preferred by the petitioner has been forwarded to the Thirukkokarnum Police Station, Pudukkottai District and that the petition enquiry is pending.

5.In view of the above submission, the Inspector of Police, Thirukkokarnum Police Station, Pudukkottai District is suo motu impleaded as 3rd respondent in this petition and the third respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the third respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (W) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, District Police Office, Pudukkottai District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Pudukkottai District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Thirukkokarnum Police Station, Pudukkottai District. 4.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to M/s.A.BANUMATHI, Advocate, SR No.30296 Crl.O.P(MD)No.8817 of 2016 14.06.2016 gcg SH/KBM:28.06.2016:2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/