Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8825/2016disposed of

N.Venkatesh v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-14Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8825 of 2016 N.Venkatesh .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register the petitioner's complaint dated 06.05.2016 and to investigate the same in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Prabhu Ramachandran For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate(Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 06.05.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that under the guise of making arrangement for loan, the proposed accused collected huge sum as document charge and four blank cheques as security from the petitioner, but, they failed to arrange the loan. When the petitioner asked to repay the amount and the blank cheques, the proposed accused threatened him with dire consequences. As there was no case registered on the said complaint, the petitioner has come up with this petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), would submit that petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Virudhunagar, Virudhunagar District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruthangal Police Station, Sivakasi, Virudhunagar District.

3.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.R.Prabhu Ramachandran, Advocate Sr.No.30138 gcg AA/SKS-RR/27.06.2016/2p-5c Crl.O.P(MD)No.8825 of 2016 14.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/