Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8843/2016disposed of

S.Senthil Kumar v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-10Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8843 of 2016 S.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, K.Pudur, Madurai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the first respondent to appoint a competent Police Officer, other than the 2nd respondent, to investigate the case in Crime No.67 of 2016 and to file a final report before the competenut Court within a stipulated time. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Malaikani For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the first respondent to appoint a competent Police Officer, other than the 2nd respondent, to investigate the case in Crime No.67 of 2016 and to file a final report before the competent Court within a stipulated time.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the second respondent Police hand in glove with the accused threatened the petitioner to withdraw the complaint and that he is not taking any efforts to investigate the matter and to file a final report. Hence, the petitioner has come up with the aforesaid prayer. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) would

vehemently oppose the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, however, on instructions, he would submit that the second respondent has completed major part of the investigation and he requires only two months time to complete the further investigation and to file a final report in Crime No.67 of 2016.

5. Having regard to the facts that major part of the investigation is over, learned counsel seeks at least time frame to be fixed to file the final report / charge sheet before the concerned Court.

6. The petitioner has raised only bald allegations against the second respondent. The petitioner has not produced any materials in order to substantiate the same.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, a direction is issued to the second respondent to complete the investigation and file a final report in Crime No.67 of 2016 before the Court concerned within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

8.This Criminal Original Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To:

1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of the Superintendent of Police, K.Pudur, Madurai District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District. 3.The Addl. Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Gcg/ar CSL/SK-SKN/30.06.2016 :2P/4C Crl.O.P(MD)No.8843 of 2016 10.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/