A. Krishnamoorthy v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Sixth day of July Two Thousand Eighteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice G.R.SWAMINATHAN CRL OP(MD) No.11284 of 2018 A. KRISHNAMOORTHY ... PETITIONER / ACCUSED No.1 Vs THE STATE REPRESENTED BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT , IN CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN OF 2018 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MRS.S.JESSIMATHUL FATHIMA Advocate For Respondent : Mr.A.ROBINSON, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 506(ii) I.P.C and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 1998, in Crime No.Not known of 2018, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

3.The petitioner is aged about 63 years. The defacto complainant is none other than his son. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the complaint has been lodged so as to coerce the petitioner, to settle the family property on him. 4.Even though the First Information Report is not registered, apprehension of the petitioner is legitimate and well founded. Taking note of the facts and circumstances, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner subject to certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Sattur and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed. sd/- 06/07/2018 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 2 DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SATTUR TOWN POLICE STATION, SATTUR, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI +1. CC to M/S.L.SHAJI CHELLAN Advocate SR.No.12323 MSA JAM/12/07/2018/ VR/GSR/ 2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.11284 of 2018 Date :06/07/2018 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/