Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8980/2016disposed of

Fathima Michal Rajan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-14Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.8980 of 2016 Fathima Michal Rajan ..Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Anjugramam, Kanyakumari District.

3.Ganathiraviam ..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent herein to provide police protection for the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members as per the representation of the petitioner dated 13.05.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.T.Selvakumaran For respondents 1 and 2: Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to provide Police protection to the life and limb of the petitioner and his family members, based on his representation dated 13.05.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, the Criminal Original Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. In view of the limited prayer to be granted in this petition, this Court is of the view that notice need not be sent to the 3rd respondent.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner and the third respondent herein are son and father. In respect of the complaint preferred earlier by the petitioner herein, a case has been registered and after enquiry, charge sheet also has been filed. The petitioner anticipates that there is no safety to the life and limb of him and therefore, he has sent a representation dated 13.05.2016 to the respondents. As there was no response to the same, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, would submit that the respondents would consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.05.2016 and pass appropriate orders on merits. 5.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 13.05.2016 and after giving an opportunity of hearing to the parties, pass appropriate orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law forthwith. 6.This Criminal Original Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(W) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police, Anjugramam Police Station, Anjugramam, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.T.Selvakumaran, Advocate in SR.30574 Crl.O.P(MD)No.8980 of 2016 14.06.2016 GCG PBK/GSV-PM/SAR-II 28.06.2016 ::2P-5C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/