Ragavan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Fifteenth day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.8994 of 2016 1 RAGAVAN 2 KASIRAJAN 3 HARIHARAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED No.2 TO 4 Vs STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KANDAMANOOR POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT, CR.NO.126/2016 ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.K.ANBARSAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 to 4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Section 306 of IPC, in Crime No.126 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that both the petitioner and the defacto complainant are close relatives and the defacto complainant and his brothers executed a power of attorney in favour of second accused with regard to the ancestral property of the defacto complainant and in pursuant to the said power of attorney, the second accused and others, executed a sale agreement in favour of Accused Nos.5,6 and 7. Subsequently, the accused did not settle the amount to the defacto complainant. Due to that, the deceased, wife of the defacto complainant, murdered her child and committed suicide.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that A1 has granted anticipatory bail in Crl.O.P(MD).No.7727 of 2016, dated 14.06.2016.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the investigation of the case is pending.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that co-accused has already granted anticipatory bail by this Court in Crl.O.P(MD).No.7727 of 2016, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Judicial Magistrate, Andipatti, Theni District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police twice a daily at 10.30 a.m., and 5.00 pm until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. Scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 15/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ANDIPATTI,THENI DISTRICT.

2 DO-THRO'THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THENI DISTRICT.

3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE KANDAMANOOR POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT,MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S P.SENGUTTUARASAN Advocate SR.No.30740

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8994 of 2016 Date :15/06/2016 PA/AAL-MPA/SAR III/20.06.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/