Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9012/2016disposed of

V.G.S.Dhanasekaran v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-14Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 14.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9012 of 2016 V.G.S.Dhanasekaran ..Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Keelakarai, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Ervadi Tharka Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

..Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to give necessary police protection to the petitioner as per his complaint dated 01.02.2016 and 11.04.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.F.Deepak For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondents to provide police protection to the petitioner based on his complaint dated 01.02.2016 and 11.04.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to civil dispute, the opponents threatened the petitioner, for which the petitioner has preferred a complaint dated 01.02.2016 to the second respondent. As there was no response to the same, apprehending threat to his life and limb, the petitioner has sent a representation dated 11.04.2016 seeking Police protection to the first and third respondents.

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents, on instructions, would submit that the petitioner did not produce any documents before the respondents, due to which the respondents are not in a position to take any action. 5.At this juncture, the learned counsel for the petitioner has given an undertaking that the petitioner would produce relevant documents before the third respondent. The said undertaking is recorded.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

6.Under such circumstances, the third respondent Police is directed to conduct appropriate enquiry based on the documents to be produced by the petitioner and to take further action in accordance with law.

7.This Criminal Original Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai-23.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Ramanathapuram District. 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Keelakarai, Ramanathapuram District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Ervadi Tharka Police Station, Ramanathapuram District.

4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.F.Deepak, Advocate in SR.30542 Crl.O.P(MD)No.9012 of 2016 14.06.2016 gcg PBK/KBM 28.06.2016 ::2P-6C:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/