Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9018/2016disposed of

M.P.Veramalai v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-15Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9018 of 2016 M.P.Veramalai .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sanampatti Police Station, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.02.2016 against the proposed accused and proceed the same as per law.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Pandi Maharaja For Respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 16.02.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that the son of the petitioner has married one Gunasunthari. She did not lead a peaceful life with the petitioner's son and she compelled him for separate life. On 12.02.2016, the said Gunasunthari and other proposed accused have threatened the petitioner to give a sum of Rs.10,00,000/-. They https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

also intimidated him with dire consequences. As there was no case registered, the petitioner has come up with this petition. 4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Records) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District. Dindigul.

2.The Inspector of Police, Sanampatti Police Station, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

3.The Government Advocate(Crl.Side) Madura Bench of Madras high Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.R.PANDIMAHARAJA ADVOCATE IN SR.NO: 30815 Mj JA-ARK-PV-27.6.2016/2P: 5C Crl.O.P(MD)No.9018 of 2016 15.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/