Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9069/2016disposed of

K.Rajmohan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-15Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9069 of 2016 K.Rajmohan .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents to register the First Information Report on the basis of the complaint preferred by the petitioner on 11.02.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Thangapandian For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 11.02.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that the petitioner has filed a civil suit, since the proposed accused illegally occupied his land and obtained an order of interim injunction. When he tried to enter into the property on the basis of the injunction order granted by the Court below, the proposed accused along with their henchmen abused him in filthy language, attempted to attack him and also gave a life threat to him. As no case was registered on the said complaint, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Records) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kodaikanal Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1 CC to Mr.R.THANGA PANDIAN, Advocate, SR No.30413 Crl.O.P(MD)No.9069 of 2016 15.06.2016 gcg SH/DB:30.06.2016:2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/