Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9091/2016disposed of

K. Saravanan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-15Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 15.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9091 of 2016 K.Saravanan .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadipatti Police Station, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent to register a case on the bas of the petitioner's complaint dated 13.04.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.Karthick Subramanian For respondents : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 13.04.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that under the guise of making arrangement for kidney transformation, in January, 2015, the proposed accused received a sum of Rs.3,70,000/- from the petitioner's mother, but they failed to do so. When it came to light that they cheated by the proposed accused, the petitioner and his mother went to the house of the proposed accused and asked to return the money, but the proposed accused gave a life threat to them. As no case was registered on the said complaint, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

[2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar(W) /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vadipatti Police Station, Vadipatti, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to M/S.S.Karthick Subramanian, Advocate in SR.No.30473 Crl.O.P(MD)No.9091 of 2016 15.06.2016 gcg PA/AAL-MPA/SAR III/22.06.2016/2P/5C (IT) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/