Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9103/2016disposed of

Rajagopal v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-21Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9103 of 2016 Rajagopal .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.State rep. by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Trichy District.

3.Govintharaj 4.Thangam 5.Suntharam 6.Sakthivel .. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents herein to provide police protection to the petitioner and his family members on the representation made by the petitioner to the respondents on 01.06.2016.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Illanchezian For respondents 1 and 2 : Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the respondents 1 and 2 to provide Police protection to the petitioner and his family members, based on his representation dated 01.06.2016. 2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents 1 and 2. By consent, the Criminal Original Petition itself is taken up for final disposal. In view of the limited prayer to be granted in this petition, this Court is of the view that notice need not be sent to the respondents 3 to 6. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that due to previous motive, the opponents of the petitioner threatened him with deadly weapons and also gave a life threat to him and his family members and therefore, anticipating danger, the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 01.06.2016 seeking Police protection to the second respondent. As there was no response to the same, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.The learned Government Advocate appearing for the official respondents, on instructions, would submit that the second respondent would consider the representation of the petitioner dated 01.06.2016 and pass appropriate orders on merits.

5.In view of the submission made by the learned Government Advocate, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 01.06.2016 and after giving an opportunity of hearing to both the parties, pass appropriate orders on the same on merits and in accordance with law forthwith.

6.This Criminal Original Petition is accordingly disposed of. Sd/ Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Trichy District, Trichy.

2.The Sub-Inspector of Police, Kattuputhur Police Station, Trichy District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to M/S.V.Illanchezian, Advocate, SR.No. 31842 Crl.O.P(MD)No.9103 of 2016 21.06.2016 gcg AM/GSV.PM/SAR-II/29.06.2016/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/