Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9167/2016disposed of

A.Pirama Nayagam@Bramma v. The Commissioner Of Police

2016-06-16Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P(MD)No.9167 of 2016 A.Pirama Nayagam @ Bramma ..Petitioner/ Defacto Complaint .Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City Police, Tirunelveli.

2.State represented by the Inspector of Police City Crime Branch Palam Police Station Upstairs Tirunelveli City ..Respondents/Complaint PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 28.03.2016. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Selvan For Respondent :Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Govt. Advocate(Crl. Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking a direction to the 2nd respondent to register a case on the complaint of the petitioner dated 28.03.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that the proposed accused, who are working under the Education Department, colluding together misappropriated the funds collected from the students by issuing guides and the funds collected for cleaning toilet of the school from the students, by creating forged documents and that the 4th and 5th proposed accused have been doing money lending business inside the school campus for exorbitant interest. As no case was registered on the said complaint, the petitioner has come up with this petition. 4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AS) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS) To 1.The Commissioner of Police, Tirunelveli City Police, Tirunelveli.

2.The Inspector of Police City Crime Branch Palam Police Station Upstairs Tirunelveli City 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1cc to Mr.T.Selvam, Advocate in SR.31128 Crl.O.P(MD)No.9167 of 2016 16.06.2016 gcg PBK/SKS-RR/SAR-I 01.07.2016 ::2p-5c:

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/