← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/918/2016ordered

C.Kumar v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-01-20Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twentieth day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.918 of 2016 C.KUMAR ... PETITIONER/SOLE ACCUSED Vs.

STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANJAVUR SOUTH POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR.

CR.NO. 12 OF 2016. ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.T.A.EBENEZER Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as sole accused, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC, in Crime No.12 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner abused the defacto complainant with unparliamentary words and threatened him. On his complaint, the case has been registered for the above said offences.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that he is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and he has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the petitioner abused the defacto complainant with unparliamentary words.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/ the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thanjavur and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two

sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 20/01/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.1, THANJAVUR.

2 -DO- THRO' THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,THANJAVUR AT KUMBAKONAM. 3 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE THANJAVUR SOUTH POLICE STATION, THANJAVUR.

+1. CC to M/S.T.A.EBENEZER Advocate SR.No.3368 akm/21.01.2016/ 2p- 6c/MP/PM/SAR-II ORDER IN CRL OP(MD) No.918 of 2016 Date :20/01/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/