← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9108/2022granted

K.Reji v. The Sub Inspector Of Police

2022-05-18Honourable Mrs Justice T.V.Thamilselvi3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/05/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI K.Reji ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs The State represented by The Sub Inspector of Police, Kollencode Police Station, Kaniyakumari District.

Crime No. 165 of 2022.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.C.Muthu Saravanan.C, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthikumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.165 of 2022 on the file of the respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 354(B), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.165 of 2022 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant is working in a Mobile Service Centre by name Anugraha Agency and that on 10.05.2022 at 11.15 a.m, the petitioner said to have visited the shop for recharging his mobile. At that time, the defacto complainant informed the petitioner that she could not recharge the mobile right now due to the server error. But, the petitioner compelled the defacto complainant to recharge the mobile and on her refusal he said to have misbehaved with her and criminally intimidated her. Hence, the complaint.

1/3

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the State would submit that no one sustained injury. 5.Considering the fact that no one sustained injury and that the petitioner is not having any bad antecedents, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Kuzhithurai, Kaniyakumari District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further conditions that: (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the learned Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police once in a week (ie., on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused / petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 18/05/2022 / TRUE COPY / 20/05/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

vsg Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, KUZHITHURAI, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

3 THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE KOLLENCODE POLICE STATION, KANIYAKUMARI DISTRICT 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI. +1. CC to M/S. MUTHU SARAVANAN. C Advocate SR.No.4707 +1.CC to M/S.MUTHU SARAVANAN.C,Advocate SR.No.4977 (Date:20/05/2022)

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9108 of 2022 Date :18/05/2022 SA/SVR/SAR:II/20.05.2022 : 3P/7C 3/3