Gunasekaran v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 18/05/2022 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice T.V.THAMILSELVI Gunasekaran ... Petitioner/Sole Accused Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Cumbum South Police Station, Theni District.

(Crime No.126 of 2022). ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.Sundarapandian, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Sakthikumar, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR BAIL Under Sec.439 of Cr.P.C.

PRAYER :- For Bail in Crime No.126 of 2022 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner/Accused, who was arrested and remanded judicial custody on 02.04.2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 489 (A), 489(B), 489(C) and 489(D) of IPC in Crime No.126 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the sole accused and he has not committed any offence. He further submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

3.The learned Government Advocate(Crl.side) appearing for the respondent submits that investigation is almost completed and the amount has also been recovered from the petitioner. 1/3

4.The petitioner is the sole accused and investigation is almost completed and the petitioner is in custody from 02.04.2022. 5.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Uthamapalaym, Theni District.

(i)the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate/concerned court may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank Pass Book to ensure their identity;

(ii)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police on every Wednesday and Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of three months and thereafter as and when required for interrogation; (iii)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness; (iv)the petitioner shall not abscond during trial; (v)On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. sd/- 18/05/2022 / TRUE COPY / 18/05/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE UTHAMAPALAYAM THENI DISTRICT.

2 DO-THROUGH : THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, THENI DISTRICT.

2/3

3 THE OFFICER INCHARGE, DISTRICT PRISON, THENI.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CUMBUM SOUTH POLICE STATION, THENI DISTRICT.

5 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.S.S.SUNDARAPANDIAN, Advocate ( SR-4691[I] dated 18/05/2022 )

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9131 of 2022 Date :18/05/2022 RS/SVR/SAR.2 (18.05.2022) 3P-7C 3/3