J.Pandikannan, v. The Chairman And Managing

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.07.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.(MD) No.6747 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2014 J.Pandikannan ... Petitioner vs.

1.The Chairman & Managing Director Tamilnadu Generation and Electricity Distribution Corporation Ltd.

144, Anna Salai, Chennai-2 2.The Chief Engineer (Personal) Tamilnadu Generation and Electricity Distribution Corporation Ltd.

144, Annasalai, Chennai-2 3.The Chief Engineer Distribution Madurai Region Tamilnadu Generation and Electricity Distribution Corporation Ltd.

K.Pudur, Maduai-7 ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned selection list dated 20.02.2014 published by the respondents through their official website and to quash the same and consequently directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for selection and appointment as Helper (Trainee) and to pass such other or further orders. For Petitioner :

Mr.R.Thangasamy For Respondents :

Mr.G.Kasinathadurai

ORDER

When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the respondents submitted that the process of selection for appointment to the post of Helper (Trainee) had been concluded during the year 2014 and the selected candidates were appointed and they are working as Helpers (Trainees) for the past more than five years.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. The learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner submitted that the process of selection for appointment to the post of Helper (Trainee) was not conducted transparently and the established principles for selection were not scrupulously followed by the respondents.

3. This Court cannot adjudicate these broad grounds at this length of time, in view of the fact that the selected candidates were appointed during the year 2014 and they are working as Helpers (Trainees) for the past more than five years. This apart, the writ petitioner has not neither impleaded the appointed candidates as party respondents nor challenged the appointment orders issued in their favour in the present writ petition.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-II) / True Copy / Sub Assistant Registrar(CS- ) +1 CC to M/s.T.ARUL, Advocate ( SR-73767[F] dated 05/07/2019 ) +1 CC to M/s.G.KASINATHA DURAI, Advocate (SR-73963[F] dated 08/07/2019) Krk W.P.(MD) No.6747 of 2014 and M.P.(MD) No.2 of 2014 04.07.2019 ES/16.07.2019/2P/3C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/