Mookaiya v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Third day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.9422 of 2016 1 MOOKAIYA 2 PETHAMMAL 3 RAMESH ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED RANK A2 TO A4 Vs THE STATE REP. BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SILAIMAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

CRIME NO.229/2016 ... RESPONDENT FOR PETITIONER : M/S M.SIDDHARTHAN, ADVOCATE FOR RESPONDENT : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN, GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE ( CRL. SIDE) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 to 4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(B),323, 324 and 506 (i) of IPC, in Crime No.229 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners along with other accused attacked the defacto complainant by using hands and also abused him in filthy language.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Madurai and on each of them executing a https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 23/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.II, MADURAI.

2. DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, MADURAI

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SILAIMAN POLICE STATION, MADURAI.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S M.SIDDHARTHAN Advocate SR.No. 32544

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9422 of 2016 Date :23/06/2016 TRP TE/AAL-MPA/SAR-I : 28/06/2016 : 2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/