Isack Samuelraj v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.9486 of 2016 1 ISACK SAMUELRAJ 2 SELVAN 3 SELVAPRAKASH @ PONRAJ 4 GABRIEAL 5 ANBALAGAN 6 HENDRY 7 VINITHRAJA @ VINITH 8 ARULRAJ ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 TO 6, 8,10 & 12 Vs STATE REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERUVADI POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
(CRIME NO. 84 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNITHEVAN Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.2 to 6, 8, 10,12, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 147,294(b),323,506 (ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.84 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel the petitioners along with other accused assaulted the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital.
5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nanguneri and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 6.00 p.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 20/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,NANGUNERI 2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE,TIRUNELVELI 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ERUVADI POLICE STATION,TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.
4 THE ADDL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.
+1. CC to M/S P.T.RAMESH RAJA Advocate SR.No.31499
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.9486 of 2016 Date :20/06/2016 AA/SK-SKN/SAR-I/21.06.2016/2p-6c https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/