← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9503/2016allowed

Syed Ibrahim v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-09-19Honourable Mr Justice B. Gokuldas2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Nineteenth day of September Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice B.GOKULDAS CRL OP(MD) No.9503 of 2016 1 SYED IBRAHIM 2 RAHAMATH NISSA 3 KHAJA MOHIDEEN ... PETITIONERS / ACCUSED RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE, REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT.

CR. NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2016 ... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S A.S.VAIGUNTH Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Petitioners, who are arrayed as accused, pray for the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 of Cr.P.C. for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A) IPC and Section 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act in Crime No.16 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police.

2. The case of the prosecution is that petitioners harassed the defacto complainant by demanding dowry.

3.Learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submits that after filing of this petition, case has been registered in Crime No.16 of 2016 and he produced copy of FIR.

4. On consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made, this Court is of the view that the petitioners can be granted the relief prayed for and accordingly; (a) In the event of arrest by or on appearance before the respondent police;

(b) In the event of appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Thoothukudi, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(i) petitioners shall be enlarged on bail on each of them executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for the like sum to their satisfaction; (ii) petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the fact of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer;

(iii) petitioners 1 and 3 shall be available for interrogation by the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m for a period of two weeks and thereafter as and when required and the second petitioner, being a lady, shall appear before the respondent police as and when required.

sd/- 19/09/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

CM TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE NO.I, THOOTHUKUDI 2 DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. 4 THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

1CC TO MR. A.S.VAIGUNTH, ADVOCATE SR: 54381 GJM/GSV/PM/SAR-III-22.9.16-2P-6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9503 of 2016 Date :19/09/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/