Chariman v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 22.04.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL Chariman ... Petitioner Vs.

1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Thoothukudi District,

2. The Superintendent of Police, Thoothukudi District,

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District,

4. The District Registrar, O/o. the District Registrar, Masailmanipuram, Thoothukudi District.

5. The Sub Registrar, R.Murapanadu, Thoothukudi District, Page No. 1 of 5

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, for issuance of Writ of Mandamus, directing the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action against the persons who preferred a forged document bearing document No. 1567/2024 dated 08.06.2024 in respect of survey No. 224/3, with an extent of 77 cents Punja Lands bearing Patta No. 691, Vallanadu Village, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi thereby considered the petitioner representation dated 17.02.2025. For Petitioner : Ms. R. Jeya Revathy For R1, R3 to R5 : Mr. M.Senthil Ayyanar Government Advocate For R2 : Mr. R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the 2nd respondent to take appropriate action based on his representation dated 17.02.2025.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner sent a representation dated 17.02.2025 for taking action against one Karkulam Udayal Thaiyammal and others for the creation of Page No. 2 of 5

forged documents and the same has not been considered. Therefore, he has filed this petition.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent no.2 would submit that they received the representation from the petitioner and the same is under enquiry. They will conduct enquiry and take appropriate action in accordance with law within fifteen days.

4. The learned Government Advocate appearing for the respondents no.1, 3 to 5 would submit that they received the representation of the petitioner and they will also cooperate for enquiry.

5. Considering the prayer sought for in the petition and recording the above said submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 17.02.2025 and take appropriate action in accordance with law within a period of fifteen [15] days from the date of this order. Page No. 3 of 5

6. With the above said observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

22.04.2025 Internet :Yes Index :Yes/No NCC :Yes/No Mac To

1. The District Collector, District Collectorate, Thoothukudi District,

2. The Superintendent of Police,, Thoothukudi District,

3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Srivaikundam, Thoothukudi District,

4. The District Registrar, O/o. the District Registrar, Masailmanipuram, Thoothukudi District.

5. The Sub Registrar, R.Murapanadu, Thoothukudi District, 6.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 4 of 5

P.DHANABAL, J.

Mac W.P(MD) No.10256 of 2025 22.04.2025 Page No. 5 of 5