Sankilimuthu v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Tenth day of February Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice P.N.PRAKASH CRL OP(MD) No.954 of 2016 1 SANKILIMUTHU 2 M.SANKAR 3 RAJAMANI 4 S.UMA ... PETITIONERS/RANK NOT KNOWN Vs THE STATE REP.BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

CRIME NO. 3 OF 2016.

... RESPONDENT / COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S.J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.A.P.BALASUBRAMANI, Govt. Advocate. PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- Apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police in Crime No. 3 of 2016, on the file of the respondent police for offences under Sections 498(A) and 506(ii) IPC, the petitioners are now before this Court seeking Anticipatory Bail.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent. 3.Taking into consideration the nature of the allegations in the complaint and further the parties have also reconciliated their differences and have come forward to join together, this Court is of the view that it is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitoners. Accordingly, anticipatory bail is granted to the petitioners, but with conditions.

4. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on their appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Melur, on executing a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

(a) the petitioners shall report before the respondent Police as and when required for interrogation.

[b] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[c] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[d] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

sd/- 10/02/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MELUR 2 DO THRO THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ALL WOMEN POLICE STATION, MELUR, MADURAI DISTRICT.

4 THE ADDL.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1. CC to M/S.J.JEYAKUMARAN Advocate SR.No.8188

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.954 of 2016 Date :10/02/2016 AM/12.02.2016/NGM.SS/SAR-I/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/