B. Arunkumar v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Pattukottai
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Arunkumar B
...Petitioner/Accused
Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station Thanjavur District.
(Crime No. 131 of 2026 )
...Respondent
For Petitioner : Mr.P.Pratheesh Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 131 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.
1/6
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 318(3) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023 in Crime No. 131 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the defacto complainant's father and the petitioner were engaged in paddy business, due to which the petitioner received a sum of Rs.7,80,000/- from the defacto complainant's father. However, he did not return the same. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submits that there is a dispute between the parties in respect of the purchase of paddy and in this regard, already a civil suit is also pending in O.S.No.236 of 2025. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner. 2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the investigation is pending and the petitioner has no previous case. Hence, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and also considering the facts that already there is a dispute between the parties in respect of purchase of paddy and in this regard, already a civil suit in O.S.No.236 of 2025 is also pending and the petitioner has no previous case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions:
[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai, and on further conditions that: 3/6
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police, on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation.
[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].
4/6
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
(P D B J) 30.03.2026 apd To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Pattukottai.
2.The Inspector of Police, Pattukottai Police Station Thanjavur District.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
P. DHANABAL, J apd
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No. 6188 of 2026 Date : 30.03.2026 6/6