Thandeeswaran v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Koodakovil
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 6184 of 2026 Thandeeswaran ... Petitioner Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Koodakovil Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.34 of 2026)
...Respondents/Complainant
For Petitioner : Mr.S.Muniyandi Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 34 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 296(b), 115(2),74,351(3) of BNS and Section 4 of Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women (Amendment) 1/5
Act, 2002, in Crime No.34 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that on 13.03.2026 due to the previous dispute, the accused abused the defacto complainant parties and attacked them with hands. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he was falsely implicated in this case and he is no way connected in the above said incident. He has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. There is previous dispute between the parties. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the petitioner has 8 previous cases and out of which, 6 previous cases are pending. He opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. He further submitted that investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature, however, the injured in this case been discharged from the hospital and counter case has been registered.
2/5
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioner, and considering the fact that though the petitioner has 8 previous case, they are not similar in nature and he has got bail in all those cases in 6 cases and two cases have been disposed of and also considering the injured in this case has been discharged from the hospital, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:
[a] Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai District, and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of 30 days, thereafter, as and when required for interrogation:
[c] the petitioner shall not commit any offences of similar nature.
[d] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation 3/5
or trial.
[e] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.
[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
(P D B J) 30.03.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Thirumangalam, Madurai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Koodakovil Police Station, Madurai District.
(Crime No.34 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
4/5
P. DHANABAL, J.
TM
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No. 6184 of 2026 Date : 30.03.2026 5/5