Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9566/2016disposed of

G. Karuppan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-20Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 20.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P(MD)No.9566 of 2016 G.Karuppan .. Petitioner .Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ammaiyanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District. .. Respondents PRAYER:Criminal Original Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying to direct the second respondent to register a case on the petitioner's complaint dated 05.06.2016 and to direct the first respondent No.1 to monitor the investigation of the respondent No.2. For Petitioner :Mr.T.Saravanana Pandian For Respondent :Mr.A.P.Balasubramani, Govt. Advocate(Crl. Side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 05.06.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that while a civil suit is pending in respect of a common pathway, the proposed accused along with their henchmen closed the common pathway by using iron wire mesh. When it was questioned, they abused the petitioner in filthy language and also threatened him with dire consequences. As no case was registered on the said complaint, he has come up with this petition.

4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar(Records) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Ammaiyanaickanur Police Station, Dindigul District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to M/S.T.Saravana Pandian, Advocate, SR.No. 31936 Crl.O.P(MD)No.9566 of 2016 20.06.2016 gcg AM/DB/04.07.2016/2P/5C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/