Lprabhu Charles v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 24/08/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN

1. L.Prabhu Charles

2. S.Ajin

3. D.Anish Shaji

4. J.Anil Jones ... petitioners/Accused (Rank Not Known) Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

Crime No.309/2020 ... Respondent/Complainant For petitioners: Mr.F.Deepak, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.309 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as Accused No.Rank Not Known of 2020, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 147, 148, 294(b), 323 and 506(i) of IPC and Section 4 of the Tamilnadu Prohibition of Harassment of Women Act, 2002, in Crime No.309 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enmity, there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioners and the defacto complainant, the petitioners said to have abused the defacto complainant and also attacked her with stick and caused injuries. Hence, the complaint.

1/3

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the injured sustained only simple injury and she was treated as out patient. Hence, he seek anticipatory bail.

5.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), appearing for the respondent Police submitted that the injured sustained only simple injury and she was treated as out patient. 6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that due to previous enmity, the occurrence said to have taken place and the injured sustained only simple injury and she was treated as out patient, considering the above circumstances, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Eraniel, Kanyakumari District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty Five Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the 2/3

learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(f)if the accused/petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 24/08/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, ERANIEL, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT AT NAGERCOIL.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARUNGAL POLICE STATION, KANYAKUMARI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8856 of 2020 Date :24/08/2020 MS/PN/SAR-2/26.08.2020/3P.5C 3/3