Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9621/2016disposed of

Susila v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-21Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 21.06.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9621 of 2016 Susila ... Petitioner -VsState rep. by 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District 3.The Inspector of Police, Kottampatti Police Station, Madurai District ... Respondents Petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure to direct the 1st respondent to direct the 3rd respondent herein to register the case against the above accused on the basis of the petitioner's complaint dated 04.04.2016.

For Petitioner : M/s.S.Muthalraj For Respondents: Mr.A.P.Balasubramani Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

ORDER

This petition has been filed for a direction to the 2nd respondent police to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 04.04.2016.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents.

3. The sum and substance of the complaint preferred by the petitioner is that her brothers in connivance of the Village Administrative Officer and others, by forging the signature of the petitioner, sold the properties belong to their father without the knowledge of the petitioner. Therefore, she gave a complaint against the accused persons. Since no action has been taken, the present petition has been filed.

4. According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the 3rd respondent. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. In view of the above submission, the 3rd respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC).In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner known to law.

With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar(AS) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar.

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District 2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Melur, Madurai District 3.The Inspector of Police, Kottampatti Police Station, Madurai District 4.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+1CC to M/S.Na.Palaniyandi, Advocate, SR.No. 31828 Crl.O.P.(MD).No.9621 of 2016 21.06.2016 RR AM/SKS.RR/SAR-II/01.07.2016/2P/6C https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/