D.Rathinavel v. The Inspector Of Police
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Twentieth day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.9631 of 2016 D.RATHINAVEL ... PETITIONER/RANK NOT KNOWN Vs STATE OF REP BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
(IN CRIME NO.NOT KNOWN OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S P.SUBBARAJ Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused , apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 341,323,506(ii) and 114 of IPC, in Crime No.488 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to previous enimity, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant and also threatened him with dire consequences.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured person had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Aruppukottai, Virdudhunagar District and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.
6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.
sd/- 20/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE ARUPPUKOTTAI VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARUPPUKKOTTAI, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.
+1. CC to M/S P.SUBBARAJ Advocate SR.No.31357 RL/6C/2P/SKS/RR/SARIII/21/6/2016
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No.9631 of 2016 Date :20/06/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/