← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9383/2026dismissed

S.Pandikumar v. The District Collector

2026-06-08Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar,Honourable Mr.Justice M.Jothiraman5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 08.06.2026

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and W.M.P(MD)Nos.7501 & 7505 of 2026 S.Pandikumar ... Petitioner vs.

1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni.

3.The District Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni.

4.The Secretary, ZKM Higher Secondary School, Bodinayakanur, Theni District-625 513.

5.The Headmaster ZKM Higher Secondary School, Bodinayakanur, Theni District-625 513.

... Respondents 1/5

PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 2 & 3 to conduct proper enquiry against the fourth respondent school and to take the fourth respondent school under direct control and further to cancel the recognition as and grant under the Act.

For Petitioner : Mr.K.Prabhu For R1 to R3 : Mr.C.Jeganathan Counsel for State For R4 : Mr.M.Ajmal Khan Senior Counsel for M/s.Ajmal Associates

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by N.SATHISH KUMAR, J.) The petitioner has filed the present writ petition as a Public Interest Litigation alleging that the fourth and fifth respondent schools are collecting excess fees from the students.

2.Though certain documents have been relied upon by the petitioner, the genuineness of those documents is doubtful. Further, it is stated that representations were submitted to the authorities; however, no action has been taken regarding the alleged collection of excess fees. 2/5

3. The writ petition has been filed on the allegation that respondents 4 and 5 are collecting excess fees. However, no specific particulars or supporting materials have been furnished to substantiate the allegation. A Public Interest Litigation cannot be encouraged on the basis of vague and unsubstantiated averments, particularly when it appears to have been filed for some ulterior motive.

4.Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [N.S.K.,J.] [M.J.R.,J.] 08.06.2026 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes am 3/5

To 1.The District Collector, Theni District, Theni.

2.The Chief Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni.

3.The District Educational Officer, Theni District at Theni.

4/5

N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.

and M.JOTHIRAMAN , J.

am ORDER MADE IN DATED : 08.06.2026 5/5