Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9767/2016disposed of

T.R.Thulasiraman v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-22Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9767 of 2016 T.R.Thulasiraman .. Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Appan Thiruppathy Police Station, Madurai District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 4.6.2016. For Petitioner : Mr.P.T.Ramesh Raja For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to direct the second respondent to register a case based on the petitioner's complaint dated 04.06.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that one Vijayaragavan has executed a power deed in favour of the petitioner with regard to the land in Re-survey No.23/2E1A. After conducting survey, the petitioner has put up fencing around his property. On 28.05.2016, the proposed accused have damaged the said property. When the petitioner questioned them, they threatened the petitioner with dire consequences. They have also stated that the property belongs to them. As there was no case registered, the petitioner has come up with this petition. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law. 6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/ Assistant Registrar(CS II) /True copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2.The Sub Inspector of Police, Appan Thiruppathy Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai. +1cc to Mr.P.T.Ramesh RAja, Advocate in SR.No.32007 SDR/GSV-PM/11.07.2016/2P/5C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9767 of 2016 22.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/