Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9768/2016disposed of

D.Saravanan v. The Superintendent Of Police

2016-06-22Honourable Dr. Justice S. Vimala2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 22.06.2016

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Dr. JUSTICE S.VIMALA Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9768 of 2016 D.Saravanan .. Petitioner Vs.

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

.. Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. praying to direct the second respondent herein to register the complaint given by the petitioner dated 10.6.2016 and to take necessary action within the time stipulated by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.J.Lawrance For Respondents : Mr.K.V.Rajarajan, Government Advocate (Criminal side)

ORDER

It is an application seeking a direction to the second respondent to register a case based on the complaint of the petitioner dated 10.06.2016.

2.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondents. 3.The sum and substance of the complaint of the petitioner is that the property comprised in S.No.2073/2B, belongs to the petitioner. The proposed accused have created forged document with an intention to grab the said property. The Proposed accused have also filed a suit in O.S.No.36 of 2016 for permanent injunction. The petitioner has made various complaints on various dates. As there was no case registered, the petitioner has come up with this petition.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4.According to the learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side), petition enquiry is pending before the second respondent. 5.In view of the above submission, the second respondent is directed to expedite the enquiry and complete the same within a period of one month from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. During the course of enquiry, if any cognizable offence is made out, the second respondent police shall take action in accordance with the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Lalitha Kumari vs. Govt. of U.P & others [2013 (4) Crimes 243 (SC). In case of closure of the complaint, a copy of the closure report be furnished to the petitioner within a week of such closure. On receipt of the same, it is open to the petitioner to work out his remedy in the manner known to law.

6.With the above direction, this Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime Branch, Dindigul District.

3. The Additional Public Prosecutor Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

+ 1 CC TO MR.J.LAWRANCE, ADVOCATE IN SR No. 32179 MJ TE/KBM/SAR-III : 11/07/2016 : 2P/5C Crl.O.P.(MD)No.9768 of 2016 22.06.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/