A.Humayoon @ A. Humayoon Kabeer v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, E3-Anna Nagar
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL 1.A.Humayoon @ A.Humayoon Kabeer 2.Barakkath Nisha
...Petitioners/Accused
Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, E3, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai district.
(Crime No. 749 of 2025 )
...Respondent/Complainant
For Petitioners : Mr.A.R.Kannappan Advocate.
For Respondent : Mr.P.Kottai Chamy Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 749 of 2025 on the file of the 1/6
respondent police.
ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 318(4) and 351(2) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, in Crime No. 749 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that due to the business dispute between the petitioners' son and the defacto complainant, the petitioners threatened the defacto complainant with dire consequences. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He would submit that the car was recovered from the petitioners. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.
2/6
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that there is a dispute between the parties in respect of sale of the car and the car was recovered from the petitioners. He further submits that the petitioners have no previous case. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners since investigation is pending and the offences are grave in nature.
5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners, and considering the facts that there is a dispute between the parties in respect of sale of the car and the property was already recovered and also the petitioners have no previous case, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:
[a] Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with 3/6
two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate -VI, Madurai, and on further conditions that:
[b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m. for a period of four weeks, and thereafter as and when required for the interrogation.
[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.
[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.
[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial. [f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. 4/6
[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.
(P D B J) 30.03.2026 apd To 1.The Judicial Magistrate -VI, Madurai.
2.The Inspector of Police, E3, Anna Nagar Police Station, Madurai, Madurai district.
3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
5/6
P. DHANABAL, J apd
ORDER
IN CRL OP(MD) No. 6284 of 2026 Date : 30.03.2026 6/6