Manikandan v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty First day of January Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.989 of 2016 1 MANIKANDAN 2 MARUDHASALAM 3 KOVIL THAI 4 MAHESWARI ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.1 TO 4 STATE REPRESENTED BY, THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KARIVALAMVANTHANALLUR POLICE STATION, CRIME NO.8/2016, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

... RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : MR.KATHIRVEL,ADVOCATE for M/S K.PRABHU Advocate For Respondent : MR.P.KANNI THEVAN, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 4, in Crime No.8 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 4 of TNPHW Act and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have nothing to do with the alleged offence and they have been falsely implicated in this case.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) on instructions submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the injured had already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sankarankovil, Tirunelveli District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners 1 and 2 shall appear before the respondent police daily at 05.30 p.m., until further orders and the petitioners 3 and 4 shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. The petitioners shall comply with the conditions stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

5. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed. sd/- 21/01/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SANKARANKOVIL, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

2. DO THROUGH THE CHEIF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE,KARIVALAMVANTHANALLUR POLICE STATION, TIRUNELVELI DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECTUOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+ONE CC TO MR.K.PRABHU, ADVOCATE IN SR.NO.3457 PS CSL/JGB-DP/SAR-II/25.01.2016/2P/6C

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.989 of 2016 Date :20/01/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/