← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9898/2016granted

Sathyaraj v. The Inspector Of Police

2016-06-22Honourable Ms.Justice V.M.Velumani2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Twenty Second day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.9898 of 2016 1 SATHYARAJ 2 PRABHURAJA 3 SURYA 4 SARAVANAN ... PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 4 Vs THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU REP BY ITS THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SHOLAVANDAN POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT (CRIME NO.229 OF 2016) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S K.PARAMASIVAM Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as accused Nos.1 to 4, apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of Tamil Nadu Women Harassment Act, in Crime No.229 of 2016 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner teased the defacto complaiant at the time temple festival and also assaulted the defacto complainant.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and their names have been falsely implicated in this case and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioners.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that it is a simple injury.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that it is a simple injury, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on their appearance before the learned District Munsif Court Cum Judicial Magistrate, Vadipatti, Madurai District and on each of them executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioners shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioners shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioners shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 22/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE DISTRICT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VADIPATTI MADURAI DISTRICT 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE MADURAI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE SHOLAVANDAN POLICE STATION MADURAI DISTRICT +1. CC to M/S K.PARAMASIVAM Advocate SR.No.31992 RL/6C/2P/DB/SARII/24/6/2016

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9898 of 2016 Date :22/06/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/