M. Manickam, v. The District Collector
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2016
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.S.SUNDAR W.P(MD)No.7469 of 2014 M.Manickam .. Petitioner Vs.
1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
3.Revathi 4.Palanikumar 5.Janaki 6.Rajagopal 7.Parthasaradhi .. Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Mandamus to direct the second respondent to consider and dispose of the appeal No.Na.Ka.No.6680/2013/A4 preferred by the petitioner on the file of the second respondent.
For Petitioner : Mr.C.Sundaravadivel For Respondents : Mr.S.Kumar 1 and 2 Additional Government Pleader ***
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the said submission, the Writ Petitions is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(AE) /True Copy/ Sub-Assistant Registrar To 1.The District Collector, Madurai District, Madurai. 2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Usilampatti, Madurai District.
+One cc to The Special Government Pleader, SR.No.31862 SRM RL/4C/2P/DB/29/6/2016 W.P.(MD)No.7469 of 2014 21/06/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/