Muthukumar v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Thursday, the Twenty Third day of June Two Thousand Sixteen PRESENT The Hon`ble Ms.Justice V.M.VELUMANI CRL OP(MD) No.9985 of 2016 MUTHUKUMAR ... PETITIONER/ ACCUSED NO.1 Vs STATE THROUGH THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEIGNAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. (CRIME NO.57/2014) ... RESPONDENT/ COMPLAINANT For Petitioner : M/S J.DAVID GANESHAN Advocate For Respondent : M/S.P.KANNITHEVAN, Government Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who is arrayed as accused No.1, apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 392 r/w. 397, 506(ii) (NP), in Crime No.57 of 2014 on the file of the respondent police and hence, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused intercepted the defacto complainant and snatched a sum of Rs.650/-. On complaint, a case has been registered against the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and prays for anticipatory bail in favour of the petitioner.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) submitted that there is no previous case against the petitioner and the investigation is pending.

5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, with certain conditions. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Sathankularm and on executing a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m., until further orders. The petitioner shall comply with the condition stipulated under Section 438 Cr.P.C. scrupulously.

6. The petitioner shall appear before the concerned Magistrate within a period of 15 days from the date on which the order copy made ready, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail stands dismissed.

sd/- 23/06/2016 / TRUE COPY / Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1.THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SATHANKULAM 2.DO THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT 3.THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI 4.THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE MEIGNAPURAM POLICE STATION, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. +1. CC to M/S J.DAVID GANESHAN Advocate SR.No.32686 RL/6C/2P/SKS/RR/SARI/28/6/2016

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9985 of 2016 Date :23/06/2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/