Muniyasamy v. The Commissioner

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 25.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE J. NISHA BANU AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Muniyasamy

...Petitioner

-Vs1.The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department, Chepak, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, CMDA, Tower-II, 4th Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai.

4.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, 5.The Vaigai Sports Club, Through its Secretary, Opposite to Pattinamkathan Panchayat Office, 1/4

No.87, Ramanathapuram to Rameshwaram National Highways, Ramanathapuram,

...Respondents

PRAYER:Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for the issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the Respondents No.1 to 4 to remove, the FL2 TASMAC shop namely, Vagai Sports Club situated at No.87 of Ramanathapuram to Rameswaram National Highways, Opposite to Pattinamkathan Panchayats Office, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District., within stipulated time on the basis of the Petitioners representation dated 30.01.2025 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Shankar Ganesh For R1 & R2 : Mr.P.Thilak Kumar Government Pleader For R3 & R4 : Mr.S.Sivanesan

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by J.NISHA BANU, J.) This writ petition is filed seeking a direction to the Respondents No.1 to 4 to remove FL2 TASMAC shop namely, Vagai Sports Club situated at No.87 of Ramanathapuram to Rameswaram National Highways, Opposite to Pattinamkathan Panchayats Office, Ramanathapuram, Ramanathapuram District, on the basis of the Petitioner's representation dated 30.01.2025 2/4

2.Today, when the writ petition is taken up for hearing the learned Government Pleader appearing for the official respondents, on instructions submits that the fifth respondent is running the TASMAC Shop after getting proper license from the authorities concerned. 3.Recording the above submission, this writ petition is dismissed. If at all the petitioner is aggrieved, it is always open to him to challenge the license granted in favour of the fifth respondent, if so advised. No costs. (J.N.B.,J.) (S.S.Y.,J.) 25.04.2025 Index:Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To 1.The Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise Department, Chepak, Chennai.

2.The District Collector, Ramanathapuram District, Ramanathapuram.

3.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, CMDA, Tower-II, 4th Floor, Gandhi Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, Chennai.

4.The District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing Corporation Limited, 3/4

J. NISHA BANU,J.

and S.SRIMATHY.J ta 25.04.2025 4/4