Karthik Alias Kathikraja v. State Of Tamilnadu Rep By Inspector Of Police, Sakkottai

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 30.03.2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL CRL OP(MD). No. 6306 of 2026 1.Karthik @ Karthikraja 2.Vengadesan ... petitionerss Vs State of Tamil Nadu rep. by The Inspector of Police, Sakkottai Police Station, Sakkottai, Sivagangai District.

(Crime No.50 of 2026)

...Respondents/Complainant

For petitioners : Mr.K.C.Maniyarasu Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.M.Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No. 50 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent for the offences punishable under Sections 303(2) and 336(3) of BNS 2023 and 1/5

21(4) of MMDR Act, in Crime No.50 of 2026, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 06.03.2026, at 04.00 p.m., the accused person along with other accused illegally transported 6 units of red sand using their vehicle bearing registration No.TN 41 AV 8559. Hence, the case.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and they were falsely implicated in this case and they are no way connected in the above said incident. They have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. Hence, he prays to grant Anticipatory Bail to the petitioners. He further submitted that the co-accused in this case were arrested and released on bail.

4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) fairly submits that the petitioners have no previous case. He also submits that the main accused, namely A1, in this case was arrested and released on bail. However, he opposes to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 2/5

5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the rival submissions on either side and the nature of offences charged against the petitioners, the materials involved and considering the facts that the main accused, namely A1, was arrested and released on bail, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, subject to the following conditions:

[a] Accordingly, the petitioners is ordered to be released on anticipatory bail on condition to execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District and on further conditions that: [b] the petitioners shall report before the respondent police, on every Saturday at 10.30 a.m., for a period of four weeks, thereafter, as and when required for further interrogation:

[c] the petitioners shall not commit any offences of similar nature.

[d] the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation 3/5

or trial.

[e] the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Judicial Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560]. [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 B.N.S.

(P D B J) 30.03.2026 TM To 1.The Judicial Magistrate, Karaikudi, Sivagangai District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Sakkottai Police Station, Sakkottai, Sivagangai District.

(Crime No.50 of 2026) 3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

P. DHANABAL, J.

TM

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No. 6306 of 2026 Date : 30.03.2026 5/5