← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/8957/2020ordered

Thirupathi v. Inspector Of Police

2020-08-26Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 26/08/2020 PRESENT The Hon'ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN

1. Thirupathi

2. Nallathambi ... Petitioners/Accused No.1 & 2 Vs The State rep. by The Inspector of Police, Rajapalayam North Police Station, Virudhunagar District.

Crime No.233 of 2020. ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioners: Mr.R.Niresh Kumar, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr.K. Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.233 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioners, who are arrayed as A1 and A2, apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under section 379 of I.P.C., r/w Sections 4 (1) (1A) and 21(1) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulations) Act, 1957, in Crime No.233 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners said to have illegally transported half unit of river sand. Hence, a complaint has been registered.

3.Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crliminal Side) appearing for the respondent.

4.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the 1/3

petitioners are not having any bad antecedent and hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent police submitted that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners.

6.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that there is no previous case pending against the petitioners, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners with certain conditions.

7.Accordingly, the petitioners are ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or their appearance, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the Judicial Magistrate Court, Rajapalayam, Virudhunagar District, on condition that the petitioners shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five thousand only) each with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent Police or to the Police Officer, who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that:

(a)the petitioners and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioners are directed to jointly deposit a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand Only)to the credit of Advocates Clerks' Association, Pattukkottai, (Bank of India, Pattukkottai Branch, SB.Account No.814610110009887, IFSC Code No.BKID0008146), within a period of two weeks without prejudice to their rights and contentions before the trial Court and the learned Judicial Magistrate, after perusing the challan/ receipt, shall accept the sureties furnished by the petitioners;

(c)the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation. (d)the petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (e)the petitioners shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(f)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioners released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the 2/3

Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and;

(g)if the accused/petitioners thereafter abscond, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC. sd/- 26/08/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, RAJAPALAYAM, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

2. -DO- THROUGH: THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT AT SRIVILLIPUTHUR.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, RAJAPALAYAM NORTH POLICE STATION, VIRUDHUNAGAR DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

COPY TO:

THE OFFICER INCHARGE, ADVOCATE CLERK'S WELFARE ASSOCIATION, PATTUKOTTAI.

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.8957 of 2020 Date :26/08/2020 VSG SRS/ AKM/ SAR-II/ 28.08.2020/ 3P/6C 3/3