← Library
Madras High CourtWP(MD)/9379/2023disposed of

Kanmani.D v. The Commissioner Of Police

2023-04-24Honourable Mr Justice G.Ilangovan5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 24.04.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN D.Kanmani ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, Madurai.

2.The Commissioner, Madurai City corporation, Madurai City.

3.The Inspector of Police, Mattuthavani Police Station, Madurai city.

4.The Inspector of Police, Karuppayoorani Police Station, Madurai City.

5.D.Pappa ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take appropriate action to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner so as to clear the damage caused in the Road by the fifth 1/5

respondent in S.No.19 of 10A5 of Elanthaikulam, Madurai, East Taluk, Madurai city.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Venkatesan For Respondents : Mr.B.Nambiselvan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

This writ petitioner filed this Writ Petition seeking for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the first respondent to take appropriate action to grant adequate police protection to the petitioner so as to clear the damage caused in the Road by the fifth respondent in S.No.19 of 10A5 of Elanthaikulam, Madurai, East Taluk, Madurai city.

2. Mr.B.Nambiselvan, learned Additional Public Prosecutor takes notice for the respondents 1 to 4. By consent, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the fifth respondent has damaged the service road in S.No.19/10A5, which was being used by the petitioner and many others. According to the petitioner, this road is the only access to his and others house. The fifth 2/5

respondent has already gifted the road to the Madurai Corporation and she has no right or title to the road. The fifth respondent has also threatened the petitioner with dire consequences, if he attempts to enter the road.

4. Now the grievance of the petitioner is that he requires police protection to clear the above said damage caused in the road.

5. Such prayer of granting of police protection to clear the damage on the road is not maintainable. However, this Court directs the concerned competent authority to dispose the petitioner's representation dated 10.04.2023 within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

6. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

24.04.2023 NCC :Yes/No Index :Yes/No Internet : Yes/ No tta 3/5

To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Karur, Karur District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Vaangal Police Station, Karur District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN,J tta Order made in Dated : 24.04.2023 5/5