Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/6677/2025closed

S.Mala v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By The Superintendent Of Police

2025-04-09Honourable Mr. Justice P.Dhanabal4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. OP(MD) No.6677 of 2025

1. S.Mala

2. Vedhanayagi

3. S.Gajashree

4. N.Sundaramoorthy ... Petitioners Vs.

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Represented by the Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District.

3. Saravanan, Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District.

4. Veeranan

5. M.Sri Nidhya ... Respondents Page No. 1 of 4

PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, to direct the 3rd respondent herein not to harass the petitioners by falsely implicating the petitioners in a money transaction based on a false complaint filed by the 4th respondent at the instigation of the 5th respondent. For Petitioners : Mr.S.Sivaprakash For R1 and R2 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor (Crl. Side)

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to direct the 3rd respondent not to harass the petitioners by falsely implicating the petitioners in a money transaction based on a false complaint filed by the 4th respondent at the instigation of the 5th respondent.

2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondents no.1 and 2 would submit that based on the complaint lodged by he 4th respondent, they assigned C.S.R.No.218 of 2025 and called the petitioners for enquiry. Apart from that they have not harassed the petitioners as alleged by them.

Page No. 2 of 4

3. Considering the prayer sought for in this petition, this Court even without issuing notice to the respondents no.3 to 5 inclined to pass orders in this petition.

4. According to the petitioners, the 3rd respondent harassed the petitioners and the same was denied by the respondents no.1 and 2. However, based on the compliant lodged by the 4th respondent, they called the petitioners for enquiry in C.S.R.No.218 of 2025. Therefore, it is for the 2nd respondent to conduct enquiry and take appropriate action in accordance with law. In view of the same, this Court directs the 2nd respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of one week in accordance with law.

5. With the above said direction, this criminal original petition is closed.

09.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Mac Page No. 3 of 4

P.DHANABAL, J.

Mac To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Madurai District, Madurai.

2. The Inspector of Police, Samayanallur Police Station, Madurai District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

CRL. OP(MD) No.6677 of 2025 09.04.2025 Page No. 4 of 4