Krishna Moorthy @ Moorthy v. The State Of Tamilnadu

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 16.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL CRL. O.P(MD) No.6832 of 2025 1.Krishna Moorthy @ Moorthy 2.Mottayasamy @ Mohan 3.Abdul Basik @ Bhasith ... Petitioners Vs.

The State of Tamil Nadu rep.by 1.The Inspector of Police, Kayathar Police Station, Tuticorin District.

(Crime No.164 of 2024) 2.Nagaraj ... Respondents PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023 to call for the records relating to the charge sheet in C.C.No.274 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kovilpatti and quash the same against the petitioners.

Page No. 1 of 5

For petitioners : Mr.P.Praveenkumar For R1 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R2 : Mr.R.Maheswaran *****

O R D E R

This petition has been filed by the petitioners to call for the records pertaining to C.C.No.274 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kovilpatti, for the offences under Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC, in Crime No.164 of 2024 and quash the same.

2. Based on the complaint given by the defacto complainant, the police has registered FIR in Cr.No. 164 of 2024 for the offences under Sections Sections 341, 294(b), 323 and 506(ii) of IPC.

3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel on both sides represented that during pendency of the case in C.C.No.274 of 2024, the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and to that effect, they have entered into a compromise and the same was filed before this Court.

Page No. 2 of 5

4. Today, the defacto-complainant and all the accused are present and the Court enquired about the terms of compromise. The defactocomplainant represented that they entered into a compromise and he has no objection in allowing this petition. A compromise memo, dated 01.04.2025 signed by the parties and their respective counsels, is also filed before this Court.

5. This Court has perused the terms of the compromise memo.

6. Considering the nature of the offences and the parties have also entered into a compromise, it is appropriate to allow this petition.

7. Recording the said compromise memo, this petition is allowed and C.C.No.274 of 2024 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kovilpatti, is quashed as against these petitioners are concerned. 16.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No apd Page No. 3 of 5

To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I, Kovilpatti.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kayathar Police Station, Tuticorin District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 4 of 5

P.DHANABAL,J apd Crl.OP(MD) No.6832 of 2025 16.04.2025 Page No. 5 of 5