G.K.Vasu v. The Inspector Of Police

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.06.2023

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE G.ILANGOVAN 1.G.K.Vasu 2.Guna @ Selvakumar 3.Saravanan 4.Mari @ Mariappan 5.Velayutham 6.Valli 7.Revathi 8.Shanthi 9.Shanthoornathan 10.Uthayakumar .... Petitioners/ Accused Nos.1to 10 Vs.

1.The State Represented by its The Inspector of Police, B4, Keerathurai Police Station, Madurai City.

(Crime. No.157/2022) ...1st Respondent/Complainant 2.Chandra .. 2nd Respondent/Defacto Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, for the records relating to the FIR in Crime No.157 of 2022 pending on the file of 1st respondent police. 1/5

For Petitioner : Mr. AL. Kannan For Respondents : Mr.S.Manikandan for R1 Government Advocate (Crl. Side) Mr. C. Susikumar for R2

ORDER

This petition has been filed seeking to quash the impugned FIR in Crime No.157 of 2022 on the file of the 1st respondent police. 2.The contention of the petitioners is that based on the complaint lodged by the 2nd respondent, the 1st respondent registered the First Information Report in Crime No.157 of 2022 for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 294(b), 323, 324, 506(ii) of IPC and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, 2002 against the petitioners.

3.The further contention of the petitioners is that they compromised the issue with the 2nd respondent amicably. A joint memo of compromise was filed, which has been duly signed by the petitioners and the 2nd respondent and also by their respective counsels. 4.The petitioners and the 2nd respondent appeared before this Court 2/5

along with their counsels and also produced their Aadhar cards. They were also identified by the learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) and the Investigation Officer. Both the parties were enquired by me and they accepted the terms of compromise. Hence, the Compromise Memo is recorded.

5.Considering the totality of the circumstances, the nature of the allegations levelled against the petitioners and also in view of the joint compromise memo, this Court is of the opinion that no useful purpose will be served by keeping the matter pending and inclined to quash all further proceedings in Crime No.157 of 2022 pending on the file of the 1st respondent police in respect of these petitioners. 6.In the result, the Criminal Original Petition stands allowed and the entire proceedings in Crime No.157 of 2022, pending on the file of the 1st respondent police is hereby quashed in respect of the petitioners. The compromise memo is recorded and the terms of joint compromise memo shall form part of this order.

30.06.2023 3/5

NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes / No TM To 1.The Inspector of Police, B4, Keerathurai Police Station, Madurai City.

2.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

G.ILANGOVAN ,J.

TM 30.06.2023 5/5