Dulasithasan Nayar v. Pandeeswari
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 30.08.2018
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN C.R.P(MD)(PD).No.1506 of 2016 and C.M.P(MD).No.7368 of 2016 Dulasithasan Nayar ... Petitioner vs.
1.Pandeeswari 2.Minor.Asmitha Jeyajothi 3.Minor.Amitha Jeyajothi (respondents 2 and 3 represented through their mother the first respondent) 4.K.Sivasubramanian Annamalaiammal(died) 5.Pappathiammal @ Pappu Ammal Muthulakshmi Ammal (died) Arunachala Thevar (died) 6.S.Kasiviswanathan (respondents 5 and 6 rep through their power agent the 4th respondent) A.Sivasubbu Thevar (died) R.Subbaiah Thevar (died) 7.Thirumeni @ Packiyathammal Kaliappa Chettiar (died) 8.Sakthivel Chettiar M.K.Rajadurai (died) Mirukalini Ammal (died) 9.Chanthira Leelaprevining 10.Isak Durai Subbaiah Thevar (died) Shanmugasundaram (died) Gomathiammal (died) K.Murugan (died)
11.Velaia Esakki (died) 12.Sivasubramanian Anthony Samy (died) 13.Balasubramanian 14.Pechimuthu 15.Iyadurai 16.Mayandi Thevar Ramasamy Thevar (died) Shanmuga Thevar (died) Ramachanthira Thevar (died) 17.Renganathan 18.Pechiammal Tharmar (died) 19.Chithirai 20.Paramasivan Chettiar 21.Madasamy 22.Murugan 23.Thangapandi 24.Maruthanayagam 25.Mukkammal Muthuraja (died) 26.Sivasubramanian @ Selvan 27.Venket 28.Murugan 29.Kannan 30.Vanumamalai 31.Muthukrishnan 32.Selvakumar Sivayanammal (died) 33.Aavudaithai 34.Subbukutti @ Subbammal 35.Shanmugavelu 36.Murugan 37.Velammal Thangaraj Nadar (died) 38.Vaseekarsh Thilagar 39.Premnath 40.Pechiammal
41.Aruna 42.Annalakshmi 43.Arunkumar 44.Rajeshwari 45.Jeyakanjana Murugeshwari 46.Amuthavasugi Devi 47.Jeyalakshmi 48.Puvaneshwari Venkatasubramanian (died) 49.Karthikeyan 50.Ezhilarasi (respondents 7 to 50 are not contested parties hence notice of them may dispense with) ... Respondents PRAYER: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the fair and decreetal order passed in I.A.No.65 of 2016 in I.A.No.729, 348 of 2015 in O.S.No.708 of 1985 dated 30.03.2016 on the file of the I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
For Petitioner : Mr.H.Arumugam
O R D E R
When the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the civil revision petition has become infructuous.
2.Recording the aforesaid submission, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar(CS-I) To 1.The I Additional District Munsif Court, Tirunelveli.
2.The Record Keeper,(2 copies) VR Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.
+1CC TO MR.H.ARUMUGAM, ADVOCATE IN S.R.NO.81574. RMK DS RSK SAR-1:27.09.2018: 3P/5C C.R.P(MD)(PD).No.1506 of 2016 and C.M.P(MD).No.7368 of 2016 30.08.2018