A.Swamiappan v. The Regional Transport Officer

WA(MD) No.520 of 2022 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Second day of September Two Thousand and Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.S.SUNDAR and The Hon`ble Mrs.Justice S.SRIMATHY WA(MD) No.520 of 2022 A.SWAMIAPPAN ... 5th RESPONDENT/APPELLANT Vs 1 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE TRICHY WEST, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTOR(GRANDE - I), TRICHY WEST, TRICHY DISTRICT.

3 THE DEPUTY MANAGER COMMERCIAL TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION TRICHY REGION, TRICHY.

4 THE ASSISTANT MANAGER OPERATION TAMIL NADU STATE TRANSPORT CORPORATION KARUR REGION, KARUR.

... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS 1 TO 4 5 R.KARTHICKRAJA ... 5th RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order of the Learned Judge dated 22.04.2022 made in WP(MD).No.7747 of 2022.

Prayer in WP(MD). 7747/ 2022 :

Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India , praying this Court to issue of Writ Mandamus directing the 1st respondent to conclude the proceedings in No.12066/A2/2022 dated 06.04.2022 issued pursuant to the representation of the petitioner dated 29.03.2022, after calling for the Inspection Report from the 2nd respondent. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 1/2

WA(MD) No.520 of 2022 ORDER : This petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/s.RADHA GOPALAN, Advocate for M/S.K.HARIHARAN, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.J.ASHOK, Additional Government Pleader on behalf of the Respondents No.1 & 2 and Mr.K.JAGADEES BALAN, Standing Counsel for the Respondents No.3 & 4 and Mr.M.PALANI, Advocate for the 5th Respondent, the court made the following order:- This Court is unable to accept the request of the learned counsel for the appellant, as the learned counsel of the respondent No.5 is not agreed for any modification of the Judgment. Hence, it may be open to the appellant to file a petition for modification. sd/- 02/09/2022 / TRUE COPY / /09/2022 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

TO 1 THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICER, REGIONAL TRANSPORT OFFICE TRICHY WEST, TRICHY DISTRICT.

2 THE MOTOR VEHICLE INSPECTOR(GRANDE - I), TRICHY WEST, TRICHY DISTRICT.

ORDER IN WA(MD) No.520 of 2022 Date :02/09/2022 SA/SVR/SAR.1/06.09.2022/2P/3C https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis 2/2