← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/9137/2020ordered

Samuthirapandi v. The Inspector Of Police

2020-09-02Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 02/09/2020 PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice V.BHARATHIDASAN Samuthirapandi ... Petitioner/1st Accused Vs State Rep.by The Inspector of Police, AWPS Srivaikuntam Police Station, Tuticorin District.

(Crime No.10 of 2020) ... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : M/s.S.Siva Thilakar, Advocate.

For Respondent : Mr.K.Suyambulinga Bharathi, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No. 10 of 2020 on the file of the Respondent Police.

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner who is arrayed as A-1 apprehending arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under sections 498(A), 294(b), 506(i) of I.P.C. and Section 4 of TNPHW Act, in Crime No.10 of 2020 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner is A-1. The allegation is that the petitioner and the defacto complainant are loved each other and thereafter, they got married against the wishes of the petitioner's family members. On the instigation of the petitioner's family members, now he deserted the defacto complainant and also demanded dowry and harassed her. Hence, the complaint.

3. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (criminal side) appearing for the respondent.

1/3

4. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and the allegations are absolutely false. He further submitted that the defacto complainant wants to marry the petitioner and the same was refused by the petitioner and due to the motive, a false complaint has been given. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail.

5.The learned Government Advocate (criminal side), on instructions, submitted that the other accused persons were already enlarged on bail.

6.Considering the fact and circumstances of the case and also considering the fact that the other accused persons were enlarged on bail, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Srivaikuntam, Tuticorin District, and on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that, (a)the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

(b)the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation.

(c)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial;

(d)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(e)on breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/ Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji Vs. State of Kerala [(2005) AIR SCW 5560]; and; (f)if the accused/petitioner thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229-A IPC.

sd/- 02/09/2020 / TRUE COPY / / /2020 Sub-Assistant Registrar (C.S.) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.

2/3

Note : In view of the present lock down owing to COVID-19 pandemic, a web copy of the order may be utilized for official purposes, but, ensuring that the copy of the order that is presented is the correct copy, shall be the responsibility of the advocate/litigant concerned.

TO

1. THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIVAIKUNTAM, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

2. DO-THROUGH THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AWPS SRIVAIKUNTAM POLICE STATION, TUTICORIN DISTRICT.

4. THE ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT, MADURAI.

+1 CC to M/s.S.SIVA THILAKAR, Advocate (SR-6223[I] dated 03/09/2020)

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.9137 of 2020 Date :02/09/2020 MS/PN/SAR-2/04.09.2020/3P.6C 3/3