Madras High CourtCRP(MD)/1699/2016disposed of

P.T.Kottai Manikandan, v. M.Muthu Iyer, S/O Mahadevan

2016-08-31Honourable Mr Justice K. Kalyanasundaram2 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 31.08.2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM C.R.P.(MD)No.1699 of 2016 P.T. KOTTAI MANIKANDAN .. PETITIONER/1ST DEFENDANT Vs.

1. M.MUTHU IYER

2. HARIHARA MAHADEVAN

3. RAMASUBRAMANIAN .. RESPONDENTS/PLAINTIFFS

4. ARULMIGHU SUBRAMANIA SWAMI THIRUKOVIL REPRESENTED THROUGH EXECUTIVE OFFICER/JOINT COMMISSIONER, HAVING OFFICE AT ARULMIGHU SUBRAMANIA SWAMI THIRUKOVIL, THIRUCHENDUR, THOOTHUKUDI DISTRICT. .. RESPONDENT/2ND DEFENDANT

5. THE COMMISSIONER, TAMIL NADU HINDU RELIGIOUS AND CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT BOARD, COMMISSIONER OFFICER, NUNGAMBAKKAM,CHENNAI.

.. RESPONDENT/3RD DEFENDANT Prayer: Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of Constitution of India, to direct the Subordinate Court, Thoothukudi to dispose the suit in O.S.No.371 of 2012 on the file of Subordinate Court, Thoothukudi within the time span as fixed by this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Raghavachari ***

ORDER

This Revision is filed seeking for a direction to the Subordinate Court, Tuticorin to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.371 of 2012, within a time frame.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and perused the records.

3. Mr.V.Raghavachari, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the respondents 1 to 3 instituted a suit against the petitioner and the respondents 4 and 5 for declaration. It is https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

further submitted that the suit is being adjourned from the month of November 2014 for framing the issues and the delay in disposal of the case causes irregular loss and hardship to the petitioner.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner would further submit that the suit itself is not maintainable, but taking undue advantage by keeping the suit for quite a long time, the plaintiffs are interfering in the administration of the temple.

5. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the petitioner and without going into the merits of the case, the learned Subordinate Judge, Tuticorin is directed to dispose of the suit in O.S.No.371 of 2012 as expeditiously as possible preferably on or before 31.12.2016.

6. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar /TRUE COPY/ Sub Assistant Registrar To The Subordinate Court, Tuticorin.

+1cc to M/S.V.RAGHAVACHARI,ADVOCATE SR NO: 49860 JA-DB-20.09.2016-2P:3C C.R.P.(MD)No.1699 of 2016 31.08.2016 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/