Meena S v. The District Collector

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.04.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD) No.10226 of 2025 S.Meena ... Petitioner vs.

1.The District Collector, Madurai District.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Traffic Wing, Madurai City.

4.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

5.The Asssitant Commissioner of Police, Thilagar Thidal, 6.The Asssitant Commissioner of Police, Traffic, Kadimendu, 7.The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, Page No. 1 of 5

... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct respondents 2 and 3 to prevent the non residents of Harvy Nagar from parking their vehicle at Harvey Nagar and declare the Harvey Nagar as No Parking Area, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 07.04.2025. For petitioner :Mr.M.Marimuthu For R1 : Mr.Senthil Ayyanar, Government Advocate For R2, R3, R5 to R7 : Mr.M.Vaikkam Karunanithi Government Advocate (Crl.Side) For R4 : Mr.Sivabalan, Standing Counsel *****

O R D E R

This petition is filed by the petition to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to prevent the non residents of Harvy Nagar from parking their vehicle at Harvey Nagar and declare the Harvey Nagar as No Parking Area, based on the petitioner's representation, dated 07.04.2025.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner sent a representation to the respondents 2 and 3 in respect of Page No. 2 of 5

parking at Harvey Nagar, but the same has not been considered. Therefore, she filed this petition.

3. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondents 2 and 3 would submit that the representation of the petitioner is under consideration and they will take appropriate action in accordance with law within two weeks.

4. Considering the prayer sought for in this petition and the representation of the petitioner is pending with third respondent, it for the third respondent to take appropriate in accordance with law.

5. In view of the same, this Court directs the third respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner and dispose of the same in accordance with law within a period of two weeks from the date of this order.

6. With the abovesaid observations and directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of.

09.04.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Page No. 3 of 5

Internet : Yes / No apd To 1.The District Collector, Madurai District.

2.The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City.

3.The Deputy Commissioner of Police, Traffic Wing, Madurai City.

4.The Commissioner, Madurai Corporation, Madurai.

5.The Asssitant Commissioner of Police, Thilagar Thidal, 6.The Asssitant Commissioner of Police, Traffic, Kademendu, 7.The Inspector of Police, Karimedu Police Station, 8.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

Page No. 4 of 5

P.DHANABAL,J apd W.P.(MD) No.10226 of 2025 09.04.2025 Page No. 5 of 5